451 smart fortwo

Hello

I was wondering if anyone has filled up on anything lower than 91 Octane, we only have 95 or lower and I have been filling up on 95 since I bought the car but I was wondering if the mid range would be OK....does anyone know?

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't have personal knowledge ... yet. I filled up with mid-grade yesterday and will do a comparison with past experience now that my smart seems to have settled into the 42-43 MPG range. (We have approximately 2,000 miles on the car)

There's an owner on another board who claims to have used nothing but regular in his car without a problem.

Reply to This

only 95? You don't have 91 or 92 Octane? Where do you live?

Reply to This

I think Smart wants Us to use something around 91-95 range but the only thing that should be affected by lowering the octane is your fuel economy not much else.. Let me ask someone for an updated reason and I'll post his perspective (an ex-Exxon guy)..

Reply to This

91 is the base octane you want to be using in the smart due to its compression and often high RPMs, using normal gas will allow the smart to work but you will not want to push the smart, the burn rate of the fuel is designed for 91+ so anything less then that will cause the smart to not burn/compress/use the gas properly.

Reply to This

backfire or ping

Reply to This

The story on octane isn't as straight forward as you might think because there are a couple different ways of defining octane for gasoline.

The 451 manual (and even the gas tank cover) say you should fill the tank with gas with an octane rating of nothing less than 91 RON (Research Octane Number) and preferably 95 RON. If you live in Europe or Australia, gas octane is measured in RON and, hence, you should fill your tank with 91 or 95 octane.

Another way of defining octane is MON, or Motor Octane Number. This is mostly used in aviation and is measured slightly differently... so the MON of a particular gasoline will come out about 8 to 10 points LOWER than RON... same gas, different measurement technique, different number. So, a gas with a RON of 91 will have a MON of 81 or 83.

In North America, octane at the pump is shown in something called PON, or Pump Octane Number, which is mathematically defined as (RON + MON) / 2 (you can actually see this equation on some pumps if you look for it). Since MON is 8-10 points lower than RON, the PON will be 4-5 points lower than RON. Therefore, a 91 RON gas is the same as a 86-87 PON gas (which is why you won't find a gas pump in Europe pumping out anything less than 91 octane and in US/Canada our pumps go down to 87). Therefore, in North America, you're perfectly safe to put 87 octane in your tank (equivalent to 91/92 RON) or 89 octane (equivalent to 93/94 RON).

There's plenty of resources on the net if you want to double check what I'm saying. Some starting sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating#Measurement_methods
http://www.torquecars.com/articles/fuel-octane-ratings.php
Google RON MON or gas octane ratings

And to answer that old myth... no, if you put a higher octane gas in your car than the manufacturer's recommended octane you will NOT NOT NOT get better fuel economy or horsepower. Octane is NOT a measure of a gasoline's 'power'... it's purely a measure of its self-combustion under the stress and heat of an engine cylinder. That said, if you put a LOWER octane gas than your manufacturer recommends, you WILL get worse fuel economy and horsepower because your engine will knock (the gas will pre-detonate in the cylinder), your knock sensor will detect this and change your fuel mixture to stop the knocking... this will lower your performance. The Smart engine is rated at ~71 horsepower... you can't increase this by putting a higher octane gas in your engine.

Reply to This

you my friend are starting to stirr the nest of contravercy..
So did Smart know this and compensate for it in their computations? are their requirements to use 91 or higher pre or pos (equivalent to 91/92 RON) or 89 octane (equivalent to 93/94 RON).? Or thid they not take it into consideration, telling us to use 91, a more expensive fuel than 89 in mistake?
I dont think they would make an error that would be so unpopular with the possible clientelle looking at the smarts cost effectiveness in a market that wants to have cars run 100mpg on the cheapest fuel at the pump.

Reply to This

Ok... Go check your manual. I'll wait.

Now check the label on the inside of your fuel filler nozzle. I'll wait.

Did both say "91 RON (minimum)"?

Prove me wrong that PON = (RON + MON) /2. Now prove me wrong that pumps in North America use PON and pumps in Europe (where the car was made) use RON.

I don't care what the dealer said. If they told me to fill it with 95 proof rum but the manual and the car said to fill it with 91 RON I would trust the manual first. To be truthful, my dealer also told me to fill it with 91... but he's a sales guy looking at a number and obviously no understanding of the difference between RON, MON & PON. He's been trained in Europe... but octane isn't octane everywhere around the world.

Ultimately it's up to you... it's your money. I have done my research and have no interest in damaging my wonderful new car. 89 PON is what I'm putting in mine and I have experienced no pinging due to pre-detonation. I'll let you know if I do.

Reply to This

Well, now. Living in the land of corn in Iowa, does the idea of getting your 89 or 90 PON octane gas from ethanol change anything? (This from the guy that will pick his up this weekend).

Reply to This

Be careful with using ethanol blended gas and NEVER use pure ethanol gas (ie: E85) in the Smart. Only engines specifically designed for Ethanol gas (many of which are labelled as "Flex-fuel" engines) can run E85 - running it in your Smart will actually damage your engine due to the differences in burn rates, viscosity, etc.

Blended ethanol gases CAN be used but in the U.S. Ethanol blended gas can be up to 10% ethanol, which studies have linked to premature engine wear through corrosion of ferrous parts and disintegration of rubber seals and hoses (http://www.environment.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquality/publications/2... which is a study of 20% blended ethanol gas... but the effect is similar but not as dramatic for 10%).

Personally, I'd avoid gas with ethanol in it. I prefer my corn on the BBQ or in my tortillas... not in my engine.

Reply to This

I strongly second your opinion Canuk!

Reply to This

i'll buy that and save a dollar! i've been running 93 octane since new, i'll try BP silver 89 US octane next fill-up. i haven't had my car over 4000 rpms yet (i top out at 75mph when i get the chance) i prefer to keep it at 3000 rpms (60mph). i plan on spending weekends at my dad's cabin a little over 200 miles from home, if i can get away with 45-50mph, i'll do it! it'll take an hour longer, but i should see 50+mpg, i have a good stereo installed, so i'll sit back and enjoy the ride (hoping for cruise control soon)

Reply to This

RSS

Members

  • Eric Juda
  • Guy K. Haas
  • Robert  Ricewasser
  • Mark Wheeler
  • Kim Frick
  • Kenny Cabral

Latest Activity on 451s

discussion-comment
Linda replied to the discussion 'Mountain Driving in the Smart?' 5 minutes ago
i usually drive it in manual mode, so i did get the tachometer :) thanks for the tip!!
discussion-comment
Robert Ricewasser replied to the discussion 'Mountain Driving in the Smart?' 7 minutes ago
Your smart will perform quite well on mountainous roads. You will have to switch to manual mode and keep the RPM's between 3-4000 rpms. Hope you have a tachometer which makes it easy to stay in the power band. Otherwise, 4th gear and on steep...
discussion-comment
Linda replied to the discussion 'transmission/shifter probems/failure' 1 hour ago
has anyone had this problem with the 2009 model??? or is this mainly an issue with 2008s?? sorry if this was answered already, i didn't really have to time to read through 8 pages of answers :) thanks!
discussion-add
Linda added 2 discussions 2 hours ago
discussion-comment
SATO replied to the discussion 'Breathless exhaust system' 2 hours ago
The amount of money I make in an hour has nothing to do with its value, a very long time ago I stopped seeing what I make an hour but last I looked it was $500 or so.... I don't live in the 60s (I was not even born then!) nor would I feel tha...
discussion-comment
SATO replied to the discussion '4/2 tail lights' 3 hours ago
the only thing I can think of is the exhaust heat is seeping up the sides and coming out around that lens. that could cause the distortion and not affect much else as each plastic has a different melting point temperature.
discussion-comment
mr bad example replied to the discussion 'Breathless exhaust system' 8 hours ago
i think $263 for an hour of labor is rediculous, and that you are a TOTAL FOOL to pay over $200 for a few ounces of cotton denim that can be had at wallymart for $10-20. I felt totally ripped off that smart gave me 6.9% financing on my car when i ...
discussion-comment
JOHNj. rodz replied to the discussion 'Breathless exhaust system' 9 hours ago
maybe you should have 4 more kids instead of children, it"s really cheap to raise goats but not children. why not cry on someone else"s shoulder, i know plenty of people like you who complains there way though life. life is all about cho...

© 2009   Created by smart

Get Your Special Members Badge  |  Bug Report  |  Privacy  |  TOS  |  Sitemap

Disclaimer: This is a user generated "Web 2.0" community, smart GmbH, smart USA and smart Canada are not responsible for the maintenance or creation of this page.
All brand names and/or trademarks used are for reference only and are the property of their respective holders. 451 smart fortwo is a non-commercial site.
You are Offline Sign In to Chat!